Central Bank Currencies
No Result
View All Result
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
  • Home
  • CBDC
  • Digital Dollar
  • Programmable EURO
  • Stable Coins
  • FedCoin
  • DeFi
Central Bank Currencies
  • Home
  • CBDC
  • Digital Dollar
  • Programmable EURO
  • Stable Coins
  • FedCoin
  • DeFi
No Result
View All Result
Central Bank Currencies
No Result
View All Result

Digital Dollar Project Promotes Federal Reserve Digital Dollar

June 19, 2020
in Digital Dollar
Reading Time: 5min read
A A
0
Digital Dollar Project Promotes Federal Reserve Digital Dollar
153
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
ShareShareShareShareShare

Computer Illustration, Sinking Dollar. (Photo by: Mark Stevenson/Education Images/Universal Images … [+] Group via Getty Images)

Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Anyone nostalgic for the good old days of 2019, or any of the previous 10 years, should check out the Digital Dollar Project’s new paper, Exploring a US CBDC [Central Bank Digital Currency]. There’s virtually nothing 2020 about the paper.

It promotes the same general ideas that CBDC advocates have been floating for years.

For those unfamiliar, the Digital Dollar Project (DDP) is a joint venture between Accenture and the Digital Dollar Foundation, a nonprofit created by J. Christopher Giancarlo, a former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Its single mission is to “advance exploration of a United States Central Bank Digital Currency.”

In his days at the trading commission, Giancarlo seemed to be a fan of financial innovation through cryptocurrency, and the DDP’s new paper superficially appears to promote financial innovation. Underneath, though, it maps out a purely establishment position that would shackle innovation and isolate existing companies from its disruptive effects.

To be fair, the paper does acknowledge that the DDP will continue to evaluate “the merits of alternative models.” But the DDP’s “champion model” calls for a CBDC that will be “primarily distributed through the existing two-tiered architecture of commercial banks and regulated money transmitters.”

In other words, the paper calls for the government to take hold of a new (privately created) technology so that the existing financial industry can continue to function mainly as it does now. That’s not really innovation.

Similarly, the fact that the paper calls for new CBDC to be “recorded on new transactional infrastructure, potentially informed by distributed ledger technology,” does not scream innovation. Innovation in these new types of currencies hinges on the blockchain, an innovation that threatens the existing structure of the industry precisely because of its decentralized nature. It offers a new way to conduct financial transactions without a central intermediary.

The DDP wants to centralize this technology by government fiat, a move that would stifle competition and innovation. There is no inherent reason that existing financial firms should not use this new technology to compete with new firms, but explicitly designing a system that isolates those firms from new competition by law defeats the very purpose of innovation.

The paper also echoes a common refrain among CBDC advocates: “One area of promise with respect to a US digital dollar is in expanding financial access and inclusion for unbanked populations.”

But the paper never really explains exactly how a CBDC will expand access and inclusion. It simply cites the FDIC’s 2017 study of the unbanked which “found that roughly 14 million American adults lack a bank account.” The paper ignores, however, that this figure means that 93.5 percent of U.S. households already have a bank account.

It also disregards that nearly half of the unbanked previously had a bank account, and that many of those without a bank account are in that situation due to credit problems or reasons related to anti-money-laundering rules. (The DDP also supports those AML rules). Access to banking services, in the common understanding of the word, is not a problem in the U.S.

The paper also forgets to mention that more than half of those unbanked households told the FDIC that they have no account because they do not have enough money to keep in an account. (See page 4). That is certainly a broader economic problem, but it goes well beyond access to a bank account.

It is very difficult to see how tokenizing the U.S. dollar (i.e., creating a CBDC at the Fed), will solve any of these economic (or regulatory) problems. Hopefully, the DDP’s next paper will expand on these topics.

More broadly, the paper fails to distinguish between possible benefits of private sector innovations in currency and payments technology and the CBDC version. That is, the paper says nothing about the marginal improvement possible from a CBDC versus simply allowing the private sector to flourish in the payments sector. In fact, that the payment system in the U.S. is something of a fossil largely because of heavy government involvement (the Fed has taken over more and more of the system through the years).

To the extent that government mandates and requirements have held back financial innovation, the obvious solution is to roll it back and to allow this technology (created in the private sector) to flourish in the private sector.

The most worrisome parts of the DDP approach are those that allude to more government control over money. The DDP sees benefits in being able to better “facilitate the distribution of central bank money,” in “increasing the safety and efficiency of our payment infrastructure,” and in providing a more widespread “riskless settlement medium.” The paper is short on details, but these broad ideas sound very similar to those promoted by Lael Brainard, the Fed Governor who is promoting a CBDC to ensure that “sovereign currencies stay at the center of each nation’s financial system.”

This CBDC path – an expansion of access to, and therefore the role of, central bank money – underscores the core problem with the Fed creating its own digital currency. If everyone – not just banks or certain types of financial firms – has direct access to accounts at the Fed, then private banks will be in direct competition with the central bank for retail customers.

Luckily Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has expressed, repeatedly, skepticism about providing consumers with direct accounts at the Fed. This week, he said: “That would be a very dramatic change in the landscape of banking. And I would worry what would happen to the rest of our private banking system because an awful lot of people would opt to keep their personal money at the Fed, and then who would do the lending?”

Again, to be fair, the DDP paper stops short of explicitly calling for retail accounts at the Fed. And, it calls for a CBDC to operate “alongside existing monies.” As Larry White points out at Cato’s Alt-M blog, the paper is purposely “fuzzy or flexible on technical details.” Still, the paper does call for harnessing innovation in a way that insulates existing firms from innovation and competition.

Hopefully, future DDP papers will provide detailed explanations of the costs and benefits of various approaches to creating a CBDC. Maybe that’s a great 2020 project.

Credit: Source link

Share61Tweet38SendPin14Share
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Terraform Labs CEO Proposes the complete details about
  • Crypto adoption spreads in Argentina even as central bank tightens rules
  • Bitcoin May Finish a Brief Rebound but Is Unlikely to Go Below $10K
  • Amid the Terra meltdown, institutions flooded more than $300 million in Bitcoin funds
  • Miami And New York City Coins Faces Significant Correction Despite Mayoral Support

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • July 2019
    • April 2019
    • January 2019
    • November 2018
    • July 2018
    • April 2018
    • December 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • July 2017
    • March 2017
    • July 2016
    • June 2016

    Categories

    • CBDC
    • Digital Dollar
    • FedCoin
    • Programmable EURO
    • Stable Coins
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    What’s New Here

    • Terraform Labs CEO Proposes the complete details about
    • Crypto adoption spreads in Argentina even as central bank tightens rules
    • Bitcoin May Finish a Brief Rebound but Is Unlikely to Go Below $10K
    • Amid the Terra meltdown, institutions flooded more than $300 million in Bitcoin funds

    Subscribe Now

    Loading
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • DMCA

    © 2021 centralbankcurrencies.com

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • CBDC
    • Digital Dollar
    • Programmable EURO
    • Stable Coins
    • FedCoin
    • DeFi

    © 2021 centralbankcurrencies.com